Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
J Clin Virol ; 2020.
Artículo | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-285004

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, rapid diagnostics are paramount to contain the current pandemic. The routinely used realtime RT-PCR is sensitive, specific and able to process large batches of samples. However, turnaround time is long and in cases where fast obtained results are critical, molecular point of care tests (POCT) can be an alternative. Here we report on a multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test. STUDY DESIGN: The Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay was evaluated against the routine in-house real-time RT-PCR assays in three medical microbiology laboratories in The Netherlands. A sensitivity and specificity panel was tested consisting of a dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 and ten samples containing SARS-CoV-2 and a range of other seasonal respiratory viruses. Additionally, 58 samples of patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 with different viral loads and 30 tested negative samples in all three Dutch laboratories using an in-house RT-PCR, were evaluated using Cepheids Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 cartridges. RESULTS: Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 point of care test showed equal performance compared to routine in-house testing with a limit of detection (LOD) of 8.26 copies/mL. Other seasonal respiratory viruses were not detected. In clinical samples Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 reaches an agreement of 100 % compared to all in-house RT-PCRs CONCLUSION: Cepheids GeneXpert Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 is a valuable addition for laboratories in situations where rapid and accurate diagnostics are of the essence.

2.
Euro Surveill ; 25(12)2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-19751

RESUMEN

To rapidly assess possible community transmission in Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands, healthcare workers (HCW) with mild respiratory complaints and without epidemiological link (contact with confirmed case or visited areas with active circulation) were tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Within 2 days, 1,097 HCW in nine hospitals were tested; 45 (4.1%) were positive. Of six hospitals with positive HCW, two accounted for 38 positive HCW. The results informed local and national risk management.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Personal de Salud , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Coronavirus/genética , Coronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/diagnóstico , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/transmisión
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA